Tested settings.Zero guesswork.

GamersNexus tested Cyberpunk 2077 v2.12 on the MSI Claw A1M Core Ultra 7 155H in its stock Super Battery profile on battery (DC PL1 20W / PL2 20W). The benchmark used 1280 × 720, DirectX 12 and the Low in-game preset, with Intel XeSS 1.2 Quality at a 66% horizontal and vertical source scale, while framerate caps and variable-refresh features were disabled and tearing was allowed. The named global preset is directly selectable; GamersNexus did not separately expand every individual sub-setting. The published chart reports 28.9 FPS average, a 5.7 FPS 1% low and a 3.8 FPS 0.1% low. VRAM allocation, exact driver and OS builds, test route, capture tool, capture duration and run count were not published and remain unspecified.

GamersNexus tested Cyberpunk 2077 v2.12 on the MSI Claw A1M Core Ultra 7 155H in its stock Balanced profile on battery (DC PL1 30W / PL2 30W). The benchmark used 1280 × 720, DirectX 12 and the Low in-game preset, with Intel XeSS 1.2 Quality at a 66% horizontal and vertical source scale, while framerate caps and variable-refresh features were disabled and tearing was allowed. The named global preset is directly selectable; GamersNexus did not separately expand every individual sub-setting. The published chart reports 30.2 FPS average, a 6.1 FPS 1% low and a 3.2 FPS 0.1% low. VRAM allocation, exact driver and OS builds, test route, capture tool, capture duration and run count were not published and remain unspecified.

GamersNexus tested Cyberpunk 2077 v2.12 on the MSI Claw A1M Core Ultra 7 155H in its stock Performance (Extreme Performance) profile on battery (DC PL1 35W / PL2 35W). The benchmark used 1280 × 720, DirectX 12 and the Low in-game preset, with Intel XeSS 1.2 Quality at a 66% horizontal and vertical source scale, while framerate caps and variable-refresh features were disabled and tearing was allowed. The named global preset is directly selectable; GamersNexus did not separately expand every individual sub-setting. The published chart reports 30.5 FPS average, a 6.0 FPS 1% low and a 3.1 FPS 0.1% low. VRAM allocation, exact driver and OS builds, test route, capture tool, capture duration and run count were not published and remain unspecified.

GamersNexus tested Resident Evil 4 on the MSI Claw A1M Core Ultra 7 155H in its stock Super Battery profile on battery (DC PL1 20W / PL2 20W). The benchmark used 1280 × 720, DirectX 12 and the Prioritize Performance in-game preset, with AMD FSR 2 Quality, while framerate caps and variable-refresh features were disabled and tearing was allowed. The named global preset is directly selectable; GamersNexus did not separately expand every individual sub-setting. The published chart reports 49.8 FPS average, a 27.5 FPS 1% low and a 20.1 FPS 0.1% low. VRAM allocation, exact driver and OS builds, test route, capture tool, capture duration and run count were not published and remain unspecified.

GamersNexus tested Resident Evil 4 on the MSI Claw A1M Core Ultra 7 155H in its stock Balanced profile on battery (DC PL1 30W / PL2 30W). The benchmark used 1280 × 720, DirectX 12 and the Prioritize Performance in-game preset, with AMD FSR 2 Quality, while framerate caps and variable-refresh features were disabled and tearing was allowed. The named global preset is directly selectable; GamersNexus did not separately expand every individual sub-setting. The published chart reports 59.3 FPS average, a 28.8 FPS 1% low and a 14.5 FPS 0.1% low. VRAM allocation, exact driver and OS builds, test route, capture tool, capture duration and run count were not published and remain unspecified.

GamersNexus tested Resident Evil 4 on the MSI Claw A1M Core Ultra 7 155H in its stock Performance (Extreme Performance) profile on battery (DC PL1 35W / PL2 35W). The benchmark used 1280 × 720, DirectX 12 and the Prioritize Performance in-game preset, with AMD FSR 2 Quality, while framerate caps and variable-refresh features were disabled and tearing was allowed. The named global preset is directly selectable; GamersNexus did not separately expand every individual sub-setting. The published chart reports 59.0 FPS average, a 21.9 FPS 1% low and a 5.2 FPS 0.1% low. VRAM allocation, exact driver and OS builds, test route, capture tool, capture duration and run count were not published and remain unspecified.

GamersNexus tested Baldur's Gate 3 on the MSI Claw A1M Core Ultra 7 155H in its stock Super Battery profile on battery (DC PL1 20W / PL2 20W). The benchmark used 1280 × 720, DirectX 11 and the Low in-game preset, with AMD FSR 2.2 Balanced, while framerate caps and variable-refresh features were disabled and tearing was allowed. The named global preset is directly selectable; GamersNexus did not separately expand every individual sub-setting. The published chart reports 29.2 FPS average, a 9.6 FPS 1% low and a 5.0 FPS 0.1% low. VRAM allocation, exact driver and OS builds, test route, capture tool, capture duration and run count were not published and remain unspecified.

GamersNexus tested Baldur's Gate 3 on the MSI Claw A1M Core Ultra 7 155H in its stock Balanced profile on battery (DC PL1 30W / PL2 30W). The benchmark used 1280 × 720, DirectX 11 and the Low in-game preset, with AMD FSR 2.2 Balanced, while framerate caps and variable-refresh features were disabled and tearing was allowed. The named global preset is directly selectable; GamersNexus did not separately expand every individual sub-setting. The published chart reports 34.1 FPS average, a 9.2 FPS 1% low and a 3.8 FPS 0.1% low. VRAM allocation, exact driver and OS builds, test route, capture tool, capture duration and run count were not published and remain unspecified.

GamersNexus tested Baldur's Gate 3 on the MSI Claw A1M Core Ultra 7 155H in its stock Performance (Extreme Performance) profile on battery (DC PL1 35W / PL2 35W). The benchmark used 1280 × 720, DirectX 11 and the Low in-game preset, with AMD FSR 2.2 Balanced, while framerate caps and variable-refresh features were disabled and tearing was allowed. The named global preset is directly selectable; GamersNexus did not separately expand every individual sub-setting. The published chart reports 34.4 FPS average, a 10.0 FPS 1% low and a 4.1 FPS 0.1% low. VRAM allocation, exact driver and OS builds, test route, capture tool, capture duration and run count were not published and remain unspecified.

GamersNexus tested Red Dead Redemption 2 on the MSI Claw A1M Core Ultra 7 155H in its stock Super Battery profile on battery (DC PL1 20W / PL2 20W). The benchmark used 1280 × 720, Vulkan and the Favor Performance in-game preset, while framerate caps and variable-refresh features were disabled and tearing was allowed. The named global preset is directly selectable; GamersNexus did not separately expand every individual sub-setting. Its earlier write-up of the same 720p Favor Performance benchmark explicitly states that the test runs without help from upscaling. The published chart reports 55.0 FPS average, a 35.3 FPS 1% low and a 28.2 FPS 0.1% low. VRAM allocation, exact driver and OS builds, test route, capture tool, capture duration and run count were not published and remain unspecified.

GamersNexus tested Red Dead Redemption 2 on the MSI Claw A1M Core Ultra 7 155H in its stock Balanced profile on battery (DC PL1 30W / PL2 30W). The benchmark used 1280 × 720, Vulkan and the Favor Performance in-game preset, while framerate caps and variable-refresh features were disabled and tearing was allowed. The named global preset is directly selectable; GamersNexus did not separately expand every individual sub-setting. Its earlier write-up of the same 720p Favor Performance benchmark explicitly states that the test runs without help from upscaling. The published chart reports 61.4 FPS average, a 41.1 FPS 1% low and a 36.7 FPS 0.1% low. VRAM allocation, exact driver and OS builds, test route, capture tool, capture duration and run count were not published and remain unspecified.

GamersNexus tested Red Dead Redemption 2 on the MSI Claw A1M Core Ultra 7 155H in its stock Performance (Extreme Performance) profile on battery (DC PL1 35W / PL2 35W). The benchmark used 1280 × 720, Vulkan and the Favor Performance in-game preset, while framerate caps and variable-refresh features were disabled and tearing was allowed. The named global preset is directly selectable; GamersNexus did not separately expand every individual sub-setting. Its earlier write-up of the same 720p Favor Performance benchmark explicitly states that the test runs without help from upscaling. The published chart reports 61.9 FPS average, a 42.0 FPS 1% low and a 36.7 FPS 0.1% low. VRAM allocation, exact driver and OS builds, test route, capture tool, capture duration and run count were not published and remain unspecified.