Loading Atlas data
Performance database
Choose your handheld and game, then compare the reported settings. Different scenes, graphics profiles and test dates can produce different results.
2 games · 1 devices in this selection
Average FPS
116.76
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
PRE-PRODUCTION SAMPLE: GPD WIN 5, Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / Radeon 8060S. Does not represent the Max 385 variant or certify retail firmware performance. Source review first published 2025-08-19; later page updates do not establish a retest date. Settings: Low graphics, 1920 × 1080, 55W. Evidence: CYBERPUNK 2077 BENCHMARK COMPARISON chart in the linked review; 116.76 FPS for this exact model and power limit. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
129.31
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
PRE-PRODUCTION SAMPLE: GPD WIN 5, Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / Radeon 8060S. Does not represent the Max 385 variant or certify retail firmware performance. Source review first published 2025-08-19; later page updates do not establish a retest date. Settings: Low graphics, 1920 × 1080, 80W. Evidence: CYBERPUNK 2077 BENCHMARK COMPARISON chart in the linked review; 129.31 FPS for this exact model and power limit. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
124
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
PRE-PRODUCTION SAMPLE: GPD WIN 5, Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / Radeon 8060S. Does not represent the Max 385 variant or certify retail firmware performance. Source review first published 2025-08-19; later page updates do not establish a retest date. Settings: Very Low graphics, 1920 × 1080, 28W. The source names Shadow of the Tomb Raider without specifying edition. Evidence: SHADOW OF THE TOMB RAIDER BENCHMARK COMPARISON chart in the linked review; 124 FPS for this exact model and power limit. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
193
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
PRE-PRODUCTION SAMPLE: GPD WIN 5, Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / Radeon 8060S. Does not represent the Max 385 variant or certify retail firmware performance. Source review first published 2025-08-19; later page updates do not establish a retest date. Settings: Very Low graphics, 1920 × 1080, 80W. The source names Shadow of the Tomb Raider without specifying edition. Evidence: SHADOW OF THE TOMB RAIDER BENCHMARK COMPARISON chart in the linked review; 193 FPS for this exact model and power limit. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
175
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
PRE-PRODUCTION SAMPLE: GPD WIN 5, Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / Radeon 8060S. Does not represent the Max 385 variant or certify retail firmware performance. Source review first published 2025-08-19; later page updates do not establish a retest date. Settings: Very Low graphics, 1920 × 1080, 55W. The source names Shadow of the Tomb Raider without specifying edition. Evidence: SHADOW OF THE TOMB RAIDER BENCHMARK COMPARISON chart in the linked review; 175 FPS for this exact model and power limit. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
72.12
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
PRE-PRODUCTION SAMPLE: GPD WIN 5, Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / Radeon 8060S. Does not represent the Max 385 variant or certify retail firmware performance. Source review first published 2025-08-19; later page updates do not establish a retest date. Settings: Low graphics, 1920 × 1080, 28W. Evidence: CYBERPUNK 2077 BENCHMARK COMPARISON chart in the linked review; 72.12 FPS for this exact model and power limit. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.