Cyberpunk 2077 is an open-world action RPG set in Night City, where players shape the story of mercenary V through combat, exploration and character choices.
Cyberpunk 2077 has 54 published benchmarks. Compare the graphics profile, resolution, power mode and source for each result. Results from different test conditions are not a single performance rating for the game.
Community rating
Rate this game
Community ratings measure player opinion separately from the PC Metacritic score displayed as Atlas Score, with one live vote per account.
4.0/5 · 1 vote · Warming up
Sign in and choose a star to rate this game. One live rating per account is used for the all-time score.
The monthly Top 5 counts one rating per account, game and month.
GamersNexus tested Cyberpunk 2077 v2.12 on the MSI Claw A1M Core Ultra 7 155H in its stock Super Battery profile on battery (DC PL1 20W / PL2 20W). The benchmark used 1280 × 720, DirectX 12 and the Low in-game preset, with Intel XeSS 1.2 Quality at a 66% horizontal and vertical source scale, while framerate caps and variable-refresh features were disabled and tearing was allowed. The named global preset is directly selectable; GamersNexus did not separately expand every individual sub-setting.
The published chart reports 28.9 FPS average, a 5.7 FPS 1% low and a 3.8 FPS 0.1% low. VRAM allocation, exact driver and OS builds, test route, capture tool, capture duration and run count were not published and remain unspecified.
Best for
portable play where lower power draw and longer battery life matter most
GamersNexus tested Cyberpunk 2077 v2.12 on the MSI Claw A1M Core Ultra 7 155H in its stock Balanced profile on battery (DC PL1 30W / PL2 30W). The benchmark used 1280 × 720, DirectX 12 and the Low in-game preset, with Intel XeSS 1.2 Quality at a 66% horizontal and vertical source scale, while framerate caps and variable-refresh features were disabled and tearing was allowed. The named global preset is directly selectable; GamersNexus did not separately expand every individual sub-setting.
The published chart reports 30.2 FPS average, a 6.1 FPS 1% low and a 3.2 FPS 0.1% low. VRAM allocation, exact driver and OS builds, test route, capture tool, capture duration and run count were not published and remain unspecified.
Best for
players who want a stable middle ground between image quality and smoothness
GamersNexus tested Cyberpunk 2077 v2.12 on the MSI Claw A1M Core Ultra 7 155H in its stock Performance (Extreme Performance) profile on battery (DC PL1 35W / PL2 35W). The benchmark used 1280 × 720, DirectX 12 and the Low in-game preset, with Intel XeSS 1.2 Quality at a 66% horizontal and vertical source scale, while framerate caps and variable-refresh features were disabled and tearing was allowed. The named global preset is directly selectable; GamersNexus did not separately expand every individual sub-setting.
The published chart reports 30.5 FPS average, a 6.0 FPS 1% low and a 3.1 FPS 0.1% low. VRAM allocation, exact driver and OS builds, test route, capture tool, capture duration and run count were not published and remain unspecified.
Best for
players who prioritize responsiveness and the highest practical frame rate
GamersNexus tested Cyberpunk 2077 v2.12 on the ASUS ROG Ally Z1 Extreme in its stock Silent profile on battery (Stock Silent 10W). The benchmark used 1280 × 720, DirectX 12 and the Low in-game preset, with AMD FSR 2.1 Quality at a 66% horizontal and vertical source scale, while framerate caps and variable-refresh features were disabled and tearing was allowed. The named global preset is directly selectable; GamersNexus did not separately expand every individual sub-setting.
The published chart reports 18.8 FPS average, a 11.0 FPS 1% low and a 7.9 FPS 0.1% low. VRAM allocation, exact driver and OS builds, test route, capture tool, capture duration and run count were not published and remain unspecified.
Best for
portable play where lower power draw and longer battery life matter most
GamersNexus tested Cyberpunk 2077 v2.12 on the ASUS ROG Ally Z1 Extreme in its stock Turbo profile on battery (Stock Turbo 25W). The benchmark used 1280 × 720, DirectX 12 and the Low in-game preset, with AMD FSR 2.1 Quality at a 66% horizontal and vertical source scale, while framerate caps and variable-refresh features were disabled and tearing was allowed. The named global preset is directly selectable; GamersNexus did not separately expand every individual sub-setting.
The published chart reports 59.3 FPS average, a 34.3 FPS 1% low and a 25.1 FPS 0.1% low. VRAM allocation, exact driver and OS builds, test route, capture tool, capture duration and run count were not published and remain unspecified.
Best for
players who prioritize responsiveness and the highest practical frame rate
GamersNexus tested Cyberpunk 2077 v2.12 on the original ASUS ROG Ally Z1 Extreme in its stock Performance 15W profile on battery. The benchmark used 1280 × 720, DirectX 12, the Low preset and FSR 2.1 Quality at a 66% source scale, with frame caps and variable refresh disabled and tearing allowed.
The published chart reports 41.4 FPS average, a 23.7 FPS 1% low and a 17.9 FPS 0.1% low. VRAM allocation, exact driver and OS builds, test route, capture tool, capture duration and run count were not published and remain unspecified.
Best for
players who want a stable middle ground between image quality and smoothness
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Oct 1, 2026
Settings, measurements & evidence ↓
1% low (source metric)
33 FPS
0.1% low (source metric)
Not reported
Battery life
Not reported
Capture tool
Not reported
Capture duration
Not reported
Runs
Not reported
Test route: PC Gamer standard handheld gaming PC benchmark suite; exact route not published.
Historical external PC Gamer benchmark from the MSI Claw 8 EX AI+ CG3EM review, published July 21, 2026; the exact hardware test date was not published. Cyberpunk 2077 was measured at 1920 × 1080 using the Medium preset in PC Gamer's standard handheld gaming PC suite. This result comes from the standard 1080p chart rather than the separate upscaling chart; upscaling was not enabled, and PC Gamer states the measured results did not use frame generation. The matching interactive chart reports 51 FPS average and 33 FPS 1% low. The device used MSI's default AI Engine power mode, documented in the same review as operating up to 37 W; this is not a fixed 37 W reading. Game build, driver, Windows build, capture tool, duration, run count and exact test route were not published. 0.1% low and battery life remain blank. Imported and checked by HandheldAtlas on October 1, 2026. External Source, not Atlas Verified.
Source checked Oct 1, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
External benchmark · GamersNexus — Steve Burke and Patrick Lathan
Average FPS
44.6
Resolution
1280 × 720
Power profile / limit
Stock (battery; source lists 4–15W APU range)
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 13, 2026
Settings, measurements & evidence ↓
1% low (source metric)
37.4 FPS
0.1% low (source metric)
34.7 FPS
Battery life
Not reported
Capture tool
Not reported
Capture duration
Not reported
Runs
Not reported
Test route: Dogtown benchmark workload
Historical GamersNexus Steam Deck OLED test batch. The video was originally published February 23, 2024 and the written review followed April 4, 2024; the exact hardware test date was not published. Cyberpunk 2077 v2.02 was tested on the Steam Deck OLED 1TB on battery in Dogtown at 1280 × 720, Low preset and FSR 2.1 Quality. All framerate caps were disabled and tearing was allowed. The matching chart reports 44.6 FPS average, 37.4 FPS 1% low and 34.7 FPS 0.1% low. The Steam Deck used its stock power management; the source lists a 4–15W APU range but does not report a fixed per-test wattage. Graphics API, exact per-option settings, VRAM allocation, SteamOS build, capture tool, capture duration and run count remain unavailable. This is an older, separate test batch and not a September 2026 retest.
External benchmark · Notebookcheck — Andreas Osthoff
Average FPS
28.5
Resolution
1920 × 1080
Power profile / limit
30W (Manual; PL1 30W / PL2 37W)
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 11, 2026
Settings, measurements & evidence ↓
1% low (source metric)
Not reported
0.1% low (source metric)
Not reported
Battery life
Not reported
Capture tool
Not reported
Capture duration
Not reported
Runs
Not reported
Test route: Notebookcheck standardized game benchmark
Historical Notebookcheck measurement; source published 2025-03-06. Exact device: MSI Claw 8 AI+ AV2M-015, Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 32 GB RAM. Notebookcheck states all following benchmarks were run in Manual mode at 30 W. Settings: Ultra preset, FSR off; published average 28.5 FPS and minimum 23.4 FPS. Minimum FPS is not a 1% low. The table reports a rendered average, not an instantaneous OSD reading or frame-generated output. Exact test date, game build, capture tool, duration, run count and separate frame-generation toggle are not stated; lows and battery life remain blank.
External benchmark · Notebookcheck — Andreas Osthoff
Average FPS
12.4
Resolution
1920 × 1080
Power profile / limit
Turbo mode (20W sustained / 24W short boost)
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 11, 2026
Settings, measurements & evidence ↓
1% low (source metric)
Not reported
0.1% low (source metric)
Not reported
Battery life
Not reported
Capture tool
Not reported
Capture duration
Not reported
Runs
Not reported
Test route: Notebookcheck standardized game benchmark
Historical Notebookcheck measurement; source published 2025-10-23. Exact device: Asus ROG Xbox Ally, Ryzen Z2 A, Radeon 8-CU iGPU. Notebookcheck states all benchmarks and measurements used Turbo mode at 24/20 W. Settings: Ultra preset, FSR off; published average 12.4 FPS and minimum 10.6 FPS. Minimum FPS is not a 1% low. The table reports a rendered average, not an instantaneous OSD reading or frame-generated output. Exact test date, game build, capture tool, duration, run count and separate frame-generation toggle are not stated; lows and battery life remain blank.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 9, 2026
Settings, measurements & evidence ↓
1% low (source metric)
Not reported
0.1% low (source metric)
Not reported
Battery life
Not reported
Capture tool
Not reported
Capture duration
Not reported
Runs
Not reported
SETTINGS: Low Preset (FSR off) AF AA.
Historical source review published 2025-02-04. ZOTAC GAMING ZONE, ZGC-G1A1W-01; Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M, 16GB RAM, 4GB reserved for the iGPU. The source specifies Performance mode at 28W with automatic fan control; hardware specifications list a 30W short boost.
Evidence: the review's game benchmark table, matching game row and graphics column, with the setting tooltip checked and table visually verified. Published average 39.2 FPS at 1920 × 1080. The source's Medium result is lower than High. Both figures are retained as published; they are not evidence that High is generally faster. These are the benchmark table results, not the separate long-duration Ultra stability trace.
AF/AA labels preserve the source's notation; unspecified values are not inferred. The named preset and listed overrides are documented, but a full per-option menu, frame-generation state, cap, exact test date, capture duration, run count and driver/OS builds are unavailable. Upscaling is unspecified except where the setting explicitly says FSR off. Power connection is not identified per result. Lows and battery life remain blank. Source checking is not a new performance test.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 9, 2026
Settings, measurements & evidence ↓
1% low (source metric)
Not reported
0.1% low (source metric)
Not reported
Battery life
Not reported
Capture tool
Not reported
Capture duration
Not reported
Runs
Not reported
SETTINGS: High Preset (FSR off) AF AA.
Historical source review published 2025-02-04. ZOTAC GAMING ZONE, ZGC-G1A1W-01; Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M, 16GB RAM, 4GB reserved for the iGPU. The source specifies Performance mode at 28W with automatic fan control; hardware specifications list a 30W short boost.
Evidence: the review's game benchmark table, matching game row and graphics column, with the setting tooltip checked and table visually verified. Published average 25.9 FPS at 1920 × 1080. The source's Medium result is lower than High. Both figures are retained as published; they are not evidence that High is generally faster. These are the benchmark table results, not the separate long-duration Ultra stability trace.
AF/AA labels preserve the source's notation; unspecified values are not inferred. The named preset and listed overrides are documented, but a full per-option menu, frame-generation state, cap, exact test date, capture duration, run count and driver/OS builds are unavailable. Upscaling is unspecified except where the setting explicitly says FSR off. Power connection is not identified per result. Lows and battery life remain blank. Source checking is not a new performance test.
