Loading Atlas data
Performance database
Choose your handheld and game, then compare the reported settings. Different scenes, graphics profiles and test dates can produce different results.
3 games · 1 devices in this selection
Average FPS
32.75
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Test route: Street Fighter 6 benchmark — World Tour
SCENE: World Tour. This is one scenario of the Street Fighter 6 benchmark, not an average across all three scenarios. Historical review published 2023-07-20. Device: AOKZOE A1 Pro, Ryzen 7 7840U. Settings: 1920 × 1080, highest graphics settings, 28W comparison test. Upscaling, render scale, cap, individual graphics options and VRAM allocation are not separately disclosed. Evidence: Street Fighter 6 comparison chart in the linked review; matching World Tour bar, 32.75 FPS. Benchmark scenario result, not an instantaneous overlay reading. DROIX cautioned that these launch-era manufacturer drivers made comparisons provisional. This does not represent current driver performance. Exact test date, driver version, capture duration, run count, lows and a battery run tied to this scenario are unavailable. Source checking is not a retest.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
37.4
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Test route: Street Fighter 6 benchmark — Battle Hub
SCENE: Battle Hub. This is one scenario of the Street Fighter 6 benchmark, not an average across all three scenarios. Historical review published 2023-07-20. Device: AOKZOE A1 Pro, Ryzen 7 7840U. Settings: 1920 × 1080, highest graphics settings, 28W comparison test. Upscaling, render scale, cap, individual graphics options and VRAM allocation are not separately disclosed. Evidence: Street Fighter 6 comparison chart in the linked review; matching Battle Hub bar, 37.4 FPS. Benchmark scenario result, not an instantaneous overlay reading. DROIX cautioned that these launch-era manufacturer drivers made comparisons provisional. This does not represent current driver performance. Exact test date, driver version, capture duration, run count, lows and a battery run tied to this scenario are unavailable. Source checking is not a retest.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
20.05
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Test route: Street Fighter 6 benchmark — Fighting Ground
SCENE: Fighting Ground. This is one scenario of the Street Fighter 6 benchmark, not an average across all three scenarios. Historical review published 2023-07-20. Device: AOKZOE A1 Pro, Ryzen 7 7840U. Settings: 1920 × 1080, highest graphics settings, 28W comparison test. Upscaling, render scale, cap, individual graphics options and VRAM allocation are not separately disclosed. Evidence: Street Fighter 6 comparison chart in the linked review; matching Fighting Ground bar, 20.05 FPS. Benchmark scenario result, not an instantaneous overlay reading. DROIX cautioned that these launch-era manufacturer drivers made comparisons provisional. This does not represent current driver performance. Exact test date, driver version, capture duration, run count, lows and a battery run tied to this scenario are unavailable. Source checking is not a retest.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
84.83
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Historical launch-era test, review published 2023-07-20. AOKZOE A1 Pro, Ryzen 7 7840U; not the older A1 or A1X. Manufacturer-supplied graphics drivers; the reviewer explicitly treats these early results as provisional comparisons. Settings: lowest graphics quality as specified by the reviewer, 1280 × 800, 28W. Evidence: Cyberpunk 2077 benchmark comparison chart in the linked review; 84.83 FPS in the matching device row. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
55.9
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Historical launch-era test, review published 2023-07-20. AOKZOE A1 Pro, Ryzen 7 7840U; not the older A1 or A1X. Manufacturer-supplied graphics drivers; the reviewer explicitly treats these early results as provisional comparisons. Settings: lowest graphics quality as specified by the reviewer, 1920 × 1200, 28W. Evidence: Cyberpunk 2077 benchmark comparison chart in the linked review; 55.9 FPS in the matching device row. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
88
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Historical launch-era test, review published 2023-07-20. AOKZOE A1 Pro, Ryzen 7 7840U; not the older A1 or A1X. Manufacturer-supplied graphics drivers; the reviewer explicitly treats these early results as provisional comparisons. Settings: lowest graphics quality as specified by the reviewer, 1280 × 800, 28W. The source does not specify the game's edition. Evidence: Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark comparison chart in the linked review; 88 FPS in the matching device row. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
68
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Historical launch-era test, review published 2023-07-20. AOKZOE A1 Pro, Ryzen 7 7840U; not the older A1 or A1X. Manufacturer-supplied graphics drivers; the reviewer explicitly treats these early results as provisional comparisons. Settings: lowest graphics quality as specified by the reviewer, 1920 × 1200, 28W. The source does not specify the game's edition. Evidence: Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark comparison chart in the linked review; 68 FPS in the matching device row. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.