Loading Atlas data
Performance database
Choose your handheld and game, then compare the reported settings. Different scenes, graphics profiles and test dates can produce different results.
15 games · 15 devices in this selection
Average FPS
37
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Source review published 2025-10-15. ROG Xbox Ally X, Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme. Settings: in-game Steam Deck preset with FSR disabled; native 1920 × 1080 output. Other individual settings, frame-generation toggle, FPS cap, VRAM allocation and software versions are not separately documented. Evidence: Cyberpunk 2077 FHD/FHD+ comparison chart in the linked review, visually verified. This ASUS row is 1080p; the MSI comparison rows use 1200p. Average 37 FPS; minimum 30 FPS. Minimum is not 1% low. Exact test date, run count, capture duration, lows and battery life are unreported. Historical result; checking the source in September 2026 does not constitute a retest.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
35.2
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Historical comparison: video 2024-04-14; article 2024-05-02. Device: ROG Ally Z1 Extreme. Settings: Vulkan; Favor Performance preset. Upscaling is not separately documented. FPS caps and VRR disabled; tearing allowed. Stock manufacturer power profile: 15W (Performance; battery). Wall-powered tests used a fully charged battery. Evidence: matching 1080p chart and device/profile row in the linked review, visually verified. Average 35.2 FPS; 1% low 20.4 FPS; 0.1% low 18.5 FPS. Full individual graphics menu, VRAM allocation, exact test date, capture duration, run count and software builds are not documented. Frame-generation setting is not separately stated. Missing measurements remain blank; source checking is not a new hardware test.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
42.3
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Historical comparison: video 2024-04-14; article 2024-05-02. Device: Legion Go Z1 Extreme. Settings: Vulkan; Favor Performance preset. Upscaling is not separately documented. FPS caps and VRR disabled; tearing allowed. Stock manufacturer power profile: Performance (battery; wattage not specified). Wall-powered tests used a fully charged battery. Evidence: matching 1080p chart and device/profile row in the linked review, visually verified. Average 42.3 FPS; 1% low 26.7 FPS; 0.1% low 22.9 FPS. Full individual graphics menu, VRAM allocation, exact test date, capture duration, run count and software builds are not documented. Frame-generation setting is not separately stated. Missing measurements remain blank; source checking is not a new hardware test.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
32
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Source review published 2025-10-15. ROG Ally X, Ryzen Z1 Extreme. Settings: in-game Steam Deck preset with FSR disabled; native 1920 × 1080 output. Other individual settings, frame-generation toggle, FPS cap, VRAM allocation and software versions are not separately documented. Evidence: Cyberpunk 2077 FHD/FHD+ comparison chart in the linked review, visually verified. This ASUS row is 1080p; the MSI comparison rows use 1200p. Average 32 FPS; minimum 26 FPS. Minimum is not 1% low. Exact test date, run count, capture duration, lows and battery life are unreported. Historical result; checking the source in September 2026 does not constitute a retest.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
44.1
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Historical comparison: video 2024-04-14; article 2024-05-02. Device: ROG Ally Z1 Extreme. Settings: DirectX 12; Low preset; FSR 2.1 Quality (source dimensions 66% of output width and height). FPS caps and VRR disabled; tearing allowed. Stock manufacturer power profile: 30W (Turbo; wall power). Wall-powered tests used a fully charged battery. Evidence: matching 1080p chart and device/profile row in the linked review, visually verified. Average 44.1 FPS; 1% low 28.6 FPS; 0.1% low 24.3 FPS. Full individual graphics menu, VRAM allocation, exact test date, capture duration, run count and software builds are not documented. Frame-generation setting is not separately stated. Missing measurements remain blank; source checking is not a new hardware test.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
44.1
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Historical comparison: video 2024-04-14; article 2024-05-02. Device: ROG Ally Z1 Extreme. Settings: DirectX 12; Prioritize Performance preset; FSR 2 Quality. FPS caps and VRR disabled; tearing allowed. Stock manufacturer power profile: 30W (Turbo; wall power). Wall-powered tests used a fully charged battery. Evidence: matching 1080p chart and device/profile row in the linked review, visually verified. Average 44.1 FPS; 1% low 33.4 FPS; 0.1% low 28.5 FPS. Full individual graphics menu, VRAM allocation, exact test date, capture duration, run count and software builds are not documented. Frame-generation setting is not separately stated. Missing measurements remain blank; source checking is not a new hardware test.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
43.2
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Historical comparison: video 2024-04-14; article 2024-05-02. Device: Legion Go Z1 Extreme. Settings: DirectX 12; Prioritize Performance preset; FSR 2 Quality. FPS caps and VRR disabled; tearing allowed. Stock manufacturer power profile: Performance (wall power; wattage not specified). Wall-powered tests used a fully charged battery. Evidence: matching 1080p chart and device/profile row in the linked review, visually verified. Average 43.2 FPS; 1% low 30.4 FPS; 0.1% low 25.1 FPS. Full individual graphics menu, VRAM allocation, exact test date, capture duration, run count and software builds are not documented. Frame-generation setting is not separately stated. Missing measurements remain blank; source checking is not a new hardware test.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
38.1
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Historical comparison: video 2024-04-14; article 2024-05-02. Device: MSI Claw A1M Core Ultra 7 155H. Settings: Vulkan; Favor Performance preset. Upscaling is not separately documented. FPS caps and VRR disabled; tearing allowed. Stock manufacturer power profile: 43W PL1 / 45W PL2 (Performance; wall power). Wall-powered tests used a fully charged battery. Evidence: matching 1080p chart and device/profile row in the linked review, visually verified. Average 38.1 FPS; 1% low 29.2 FPS; 0.1% low 25.5 FPS. Full individual graphics menu, VRAM allocation, exact test date, capture duration, run count and software builds are not documented. Frame-generation setting is not separately stated. Missing measurements remain blank; source checking is not a new hardware test.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
43.2
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Historical comparison: video 2024-04-14; article 2024-05-02. Device: ROG Ally Z1 Extreme. Settings: DirectX 12; Prioritize Performance preset; FSR 2 Quality. FPS caps and VRR disabled; tearing allowed. Stock manufacturer power profile: 25W (Turbo; battery). Wall-powered tests used a fully charged battery. Evidence: matching 1080p chart and device/profile row in the linked review, visually verified. Average 43.2 FPS; 1% low 33.5 FPS; 0.1% low 28.5 FPS. Full individual graphics menu, VRAM allocation, exact test date, capture duration, run count and software builds are not documented. Frame-generation setting is not separately stated. Missing measurements remain blank; source checking is not a new hardware test.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
43
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Historical comparison: video 2024-04-14; article 2024-05-02. Device: ROG Ally Z1 Extreme. Settings: Vulkan; Favor Performance preset. Upscaling is not separately documented. FPS caps and VRR disabled; tearing allowed. Stock manufacturer power profile: 30W (Turbo; wall power). Wall-powered tests used a fully charged battery. Evidence: matching 1080p chart and device/profile row in the linked review, visually verified. Average 43 FPS; 1% low 26.5 FPS; 0.1% low 23.2 FPS. Full individual graphics menu, VRAM allocation, exact test date, capture duration, run count and software builds are not documented. Frame-generation setting is not separately stated. Missing measurements remain blank; source checking is not a new hardware test.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
41.7
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Historical comparison: video 2024-04-14; article 2024-05-02. Device: ROG Ally Z1 Extreme. Settings: DirectX 12; Low preset; FSR 2.1 Quality (source dimensions 66% of output width and height). FPS caps and VRR disabled; tearing allowed. Stock manufacturer power profile: 25W (Turbo; battery). Wall-powered tests used a fully charged battery. Evidence: matching 1080p chart and device/profile row in the linked review, visually verified. Average 41.7 FPS; 1% low 26.3 FPS; 0.1% low 20.1 FPS. Full individual graphics menu, VRAM allocation, exact test date, capture duration, run count and software builds are not documented. Frame-generation setting is not separately stated. Missing measurements remain blank; source checking is not a new hardware test.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
33
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Source review published 2025-10-15. ROG Ally X, Ryzen Z1 Extreme. Settings: in-game Steam Deck preset with FSR disabled; native 1920 × 1080 output. Other individual settings, frame-generation toggle, FPS cap, VRAM allocation and software versions are not separately documented. Evidence: Cyberpunk 2077 FHD/FHD+ comparison chart in the linked review, visually verified. This ASUS row is 1080p; the MSI comparison rows use 1200p. Average 33 FPS; minimum 27 FPS. Minimum is not 1% low. Exact test date, run count, capture duration, lows and battery life are unreported. Historical result; checking the source in September 2026 does not constitute a retest.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
84.83
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Historical launch-era test, review published 2023-07-20. AOKZOE A1 Pro, Ryzen 7 7840U; not the older A1 or A1X. Manufacturer-supplied graphics drivers; the reviewer explicitly treats these early results as provisional comparisons. Settings: lowest graphics quality as specified by the reviewer, 1280 × 800, 28W. Evidence: Cyberpunk 2077 benchmark comparison chart in the linked review; 84.83 FPS in the matching device row. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
55.9
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Historical launch-era test, review published 2023-07-20. AOKZOE A1 Pro, Ryzen 7 7840U; not the older A1 or A1X. Manufacturer-supplied graphics drivers; the reviewer explicitly treats these early results as provisional comparisons. Settings: lowest graphics quality as specified by the reviewer, 1920 × 1200, 28W. Evidence: Cyberpunk 2077 benchmark comparison chart in the linked review; 55.9 FPS in the matching device row. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
74.35
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Historical launch-era test, review published 2023-07-20. ASUS ROG Ally, Ryzen Z1 Extreme; not Z1, Ally X or Xbox Ally. Manufacturer-supplied graphics drivers; the reviewer explicitly treats these early results as provisional comparisons. Settings: lowest graphics quality as specified by the reviewer, 1280 × 720, 28W. The article explicitly says Ally uses 720p/1080p despite the chart's generic 800p/1200p legend. Evidence: Cyberpunk 2077 benchmark comparison chart in the linked review; 74.35 FPS in the matching device row. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
93
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Historical launch-era test, review published 2023-07-20. ASUS ROG Ally, Ryzen Z1 Extreme; not Z1, Ally X or Xbox Ally. Manufacturer-supplied graphics drivers; the reviewer explicitly treats these early results as provisional comparisons. Settings: lowest graphics quality as specified by the reviewer, 1280 × 720, 28W. The article explicitly says Ally uses 720p/1080p despite the chart's generic 800p/1200p legend. The source does not specify the game's edition. Evidence: Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark comparison chart in the linked review; 93 FPS in the matching device row. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
116.76
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
PRE-PRODUCTION SAMPLE: GPD WIN 5, Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / Radeon 8060S. Does not represent the Max 385 variant or certify retail firmware performance. Source review first published 2025-08-19; later page updates do not establish a retest date. Settings: Low graphics, 1920 × 1080, 55W. Evidence: CYBERPUNK 2077 BENCHMARK COMPARISON chart in the linked review; 116.76 FPS for this exact model and power limit. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
129.31
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
PRE-PRODUCTION SAMPLE: GPD WIN 5, Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / Radeon 8060S. Does not represent the Max 385 variant or certify retail firmware performance. Source review first published 2025-08-19; later page updates do not establish a retest date. Settings: Low graphics, 1920 × 1080, 80W. Evidence: CYBERPUNK 2077 BENCHMARK COMPARISON chart in the linked review; 129.31 FPS for this exact model and power limit. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
76
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Historical comparison row: GPD WIN 4 2024, Ryzen 7 8840U. Not the HX 370 model. Source review first published 2025-08-19; later page updates do not establish a retest date. Settings: Very Low graphics, 1920 × 1080, 28W. The source names Shadow of the Tomb Raider without specifying edition. Evidence: SHADOW OF THE TOMB RAIDER BENCHMARK COMPARISON chart in the linked review; 76 FPS for this exact model and power limit. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
124
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
PRE-PRODUCTION SAMPLE: GPD WIN 5, Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / Radeon 8060S. Does not represent the Max 385 variant or certify retail firmware performance. Source review first published 2025-08-19; later page updates do not establish a retest date. Settings: Very Low graphics, 1920 × 1080, 28W. The source names Shadow of the Tomb Raider without specifying edition. Evidence: SHADOW OF THE TOMB RAIDER BENCHMARK COMPARISON chart in the linked review; 124 FPS for this exact model and power limit. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
193
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
PRE-PRODUCTION SAMPLE: GPD WIN 5, Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / Radeon 8060S. Does not represent the Max 385 variant or certify retail firmware performance. Source review first published 2025-08-19; later page updates do not establish a retest date. Settings: Very Low graphics, 1920 × 1080, 80W. The source names Shadow of the Tomb Raider without specifying edition. Evidence: SHADOW OF THE TOMB RAIDER BENCHMARK COMPARISON chart in the linked review; 193 FPS for this exact model and power limit. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
175
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
PRE-PRODUCTION SAMPLE: GPD WIN 5, Ryzen AI Max+ 395 / Radeon 8060S. Does not represent the Max 385 variant or certify retail firmware performance. Source review first published 2025-08-19; later page updates do not establish a retest date. Settings: Very Low graphics, 1920 × 1080, 55W. The source names Shadow of the Tomb Raider without specifying edition. Evidence: SHADOW OF THE TOMB RAIDER BENCHMARK COMPARISON chart in the linked review; 175 FPS for this exact model and power limit. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
88
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Historical launch-era test, review published 2023-07-20. AOKZOE A1 Pro, Ryzen 7 7840U; not the older A1 or A1X. Manufacturer-supplied graphics drivers; the reviewer explicitly treats these early results as provisional comparisons. Settings: lowest graphics quality as specified by the reviewer, 1280 × 800, 28W. The source does not specify the game's edition. Evidence: Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark comparison chart in the linked review; 88 FPS in the matching device row. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.
Average FPS
68
See the test notes for reported graphics settings.
Test date not reported · Added to Atlas Sep 8, 2026
Historical launch-era test, review published 2023-07-20. AOKZOE A1 Pro, Ryzen 7 7840U; not the older A1 or A1X. Manufacturer-supplied graphics drivers; the reviewer explicitly treats these early results as provisional comparisons. Settings: lowest graphics quality as specified by the reviewer, 1920 × 1200, 28W. The source does not specify the game's edition. Evidence: Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark comparison chart in the linked review; 68 FPS in the matching device row. FPS is the publisher's built-in benchmark result, not a gameplay target or instantaneous overlay. 1%/0.1% lows and battery life are not supplied. VRAM allocation, precise test day, software builds, capture duration and run count are unavailable. Upscaling, frame-generation and cap overrides are not separately documented; do not interpret this as a verified native-rendering comparison. Named graphics profile only, not a complete custom preset.
Source checked Sep 8, 2026. Checking a source is not a new performance test.